Wargaming Rules for WW2

There are lots of wargaming rules for World War 2. These are the ones I play: Crossfire, Megablitz, Rapier Offensive and Engle Matrix Games. One day I might write up my thoughts on the competitors, of which there are many.

Crossfire

Crossfire is a company level game. A stand is a infantry squad or a tank. A player commands a company or, in a larger game, a battalion.

There are two unique aspects of this game system:

  1. No rulers
  2. Uses an initiative system

Movement is from feature to feature and because of the initiative system you can move across the entire table in one turn.

Only one side has initiative at a time. They retain initiative until they pass, fail an action, or the enemy seizes initiative by successfully shooting/fighting a friendly stand.

These differences have led to the most exciting games I have ever played.

Megablitz

Megablitz is an operational level game by Tim Gow. Being “operational” a stand is a battalion or a Russian regiment. A player commands a Corps.

I’m attracted to operational games as it gives a sense of what it was like to be a WW2 general. I’d rather command a corps rather than a squad. In fact the scale of the game gives me the chance of commanding an entire army on table.

Rapier Offensive

Rapier Offensive is another Operational level game with a stand being a battalion.

Unlike the game systems above Rapier Offensive is played on a grid. It is also unusual that it assumes all players fight the umpire and the attackers have at least a three to one advantage in numbers. Again it allows me to have a corps or even army on table.

Engle Matrix Games

Engle Matrix Games are radically different. They aren’t table top games. The essence of Engle Matrix Games is that they allow you to do whatever you want to, so long as you can make a logical argument. The “Matrix” of the title is really just your mental picture of what the game world is – from general reading, pre-game briefing and successful arguments.

Other game systems

One day I might write up my thoughts on the competitors, e.g. IABSM, TW&T, Rapid Fire, Blitzkrieg Commander, Hurrah Stalino!, NUTS from Two Hour Wargames, Spearhead, Not Quite Mechanised, etc.

3 comments to Wargaming Rules for WW2

  • I have played Crossfire on a number of times but although it seems a good idea it doesn’t work properly. for example last game I played was Americans vs Germans amongst bocage resulted in both sides on opposite sides of a hedge and resulted in a stalemate since the the system ruled that neither side was aware of the presence of the other unless someone fired which would have caused a draw. Moreover, from an aesthetic viewpoint it looked absurd. Now I know some smart alec is going to say that in in the battle of ****** this actually happened and may have on the odd occasion but we try to simulate what occurred most of the time,

    • Steven Thomas

      Chris, sorry your experience of Crossfire wasn’t great. I can’t quite figure out, from your description, what went wrong.

  • Andrés F.

    Chris, maybe instead of a meeting engagement you could try some sort of objective the attacking player must hold before running out of time? That would break the stalemate, since unless the attacker does something, he’ll lose! Just like in real-life battles. For an example of this kind of setup, take a look at the “Crossfiregrad” scenario in this site.

Leave a Reply