I invited Chris and Adam over to play test my version of S01 Attack on a Prepared Position Scenario for Tilly’s Very Bad Day. This is an adaptation of a scenario from “Scenarios for all Ages” by Charles Grant and Stuart Asquith. My scenario is Thirty Years War with Spanish attacking entrenched Swedes in high ground.
Summary: Short and intense. A much better game than any of us anticipated. It was a close run thing with Swedish (Adam) breaking the Spanish army (Chris) just as the Spanish horse broke past the Swedish line and were going for the baseline. We all agreed it would be good to play again with some minor tweaks.
Phase 1: Game Set up
A lot of the set up was dictated by the scenario. Spanish (Chris) attacker with 8 game turns to win. Swedish (Adam) defender on the hills. I think I chose Spanish and Swedish because the scenario specifies the two sides as Red (Spanish colour) and Blue (Swedish colour).
1.2. Recruit armies
Just before the guys turns up, I decided the defenders need a boost to allow them to stop the attackers. So I gave the defenders six field fortifications, not two. That means, for this game, the Swedish defenders (Adam) had:
Defender Order of Battle
- 2 x Commander
- 5 x Pike+Shot
- 1 x Shot
- 1 x Unlimbered Cannon
- 6 x Field Fortifications (up from 2)
- 9 Units; 46 Coins; 3 break point
I show the orbat here because after the fact I added a horse to the Defender’s order of battle and changed the orbat in the scenario.
The table is fairly open but a range of hills blocks the exit to the northern table edge.
Unusually the attacker deploys first in this scenario.
Chris went for a fairly standard deployment.
The Spanish centre was pike+shot in chequerboard.
Chris had a second infantry command, which you can see in the distance beyond his centre. This was a mixed formation with both pike+shot and pure shot units.
The Spanish only had a couple of units of horse. They were tucked away to the rear, facing the left of the Swedish line.
Adam spread his Swedes across the range of hills, hence across the table width. Each redoubt had a small garrison. On his extreme left his redoubt had both a cannon and supporting pike+shot.
Near the centre was a bigger hill with two field fortification pieces and two pike+shot.
To the left and right of the road was a fort with a single pike+shot unit.
Adam’s last redoubt was on the extreme right.
The photo is of the Swedish cannon during the ineffective Swedish bombardment.
The Spanish bombardment hit a Swedish unit, despite cover provided by fortifications, but the attached general rallied them in game turn 1. In fact this general got hit several times during the game but saved every time.
The Swedes didn’t do much in game turn 1. Just watched their opponents approach.
In contrast the Spanish moved forward en masse. Notice that the Spanish horse had started their movement towards the centre.
The Spanish continued to advance.
The tercios of the Spanish centre marched forward, impressive in their chequerboard formation. Behind them Chris’s horse continue their journey from left to right.
To the right of the road, Chris had one infantry command moving through the woods.
The Swedish musketeers opened up in turn 3.
Adam clearly decided his fortifications were too far apart or too far from the road, so he started nudging him troops towards the road. This meant they were only partially protected by the fortifications.
The Spanish infantry were now at the foot of the hills.
And the Spanish musketeers began firing.
Now it was the Spanish turn to move.
The battle lines were close as the Swedish fired their muskets.
Three Spanish units closed in on the redoubt to the right of the road.
Musket smoke covered the hill to the right of the road.
The only charge was by the Swedish garrison of the redoubt on the extreme right.
They charged out and scored four 5s! Which, unfortunately, is no hits for a shot unit.
The battle continued on the hill to the right of the road.
Musketry followed by Spanish charges.
The Swedish garrison was battered but held the Spanish at the fortifications.
And on the extreme right there was a spectacular example of a non-event.
Turn 5 saw the Spanish horse approaching their target … the gap between the extreme right Swedish redoubt and the table edge. They wanted to sneak past on the flank. Adam had encouraged that ambition by venturing out of the fortification.
In the centre Chris decided it was time to put the pressure on and the Spanish tercios marched forward.
But way out of the left the Swedish cannon was still firing and managed to rout one of the Spanish pike+shot units.
The main action was still around the hill to the right of the road. Adam was bring in support from the left of the road to counter the Spanish numbers. Both the Swedish and Spanish charged.
Both sides suffered but the Swedes still held the ground.
And on the extreme right the Swedes on the hill threw the assaulting Spanish back. But they were now surrounded by Spanish, both horse and foot.
On game turn 6 Chris pushed his horse through the gap behind the valiant Swedish shot unit. There was nothing Adam could do about it.
To the left of the road the Spanish fired their muskets.
The action was getting quite intense and there were a lot of charges. As you can probably tell from the next photo, the Spanish were pretty strong on the extreme right. But the Swedes still had a shot unit on the hill.
Stalemate in the melee on the road.
And on the extreme right.
On the hill to the right of the road, both a Spanish unit and the sole Swedish unit routed. That left the Spaniards in possession.
Adam was managing to get more troops in from the left flank. By game turn 7 they were arriving at the fight at the road.
The Spanish replied by shooting.
In the centre, Chris kept the pressure up to fix the Swedes in place.
The allowed the horse to go for the base edge unopposed.
Lots of Spanish charges, again Chris keeping the pressure up, and one Swedish charge.
The big news was on the hill to the right of the road. The Swedes managed to rout the Spanish on the hill and kill the general. End game. Spanish loss.
Conclusions and Observations
It was a fast and intense game. I’d set up the game before hand so, after a bit of a chat, Adam and Chris got right to it. It only took 1.5 hours to play to a conclusion. Adam won by breaking the Chris’s attackers. But if he hadn’t, Chris would have won by marching his horse off table to the north in game turn 8. Everybody was up for trying it again.
Just before the game, I decided the scenario favoured the attackers, that the defenders wouldn’t be able to stop them, and hence the defenders needed a boost. So I gave them six field fortifications, not two. This made a massive difference to the game. The defenders were staunch. Field fortifications are a serious obstacle for the attacker. Even when Adam ventured out of the fortifications, they provided small chunks of difficult terrain to blunt the Spanish attack. I’m almost tempted to nudge the number of fortifications up to eight.
I do feel the field fortifications rules are a bit messy. Not sure how to tighten them up, but something is niggling at me. I don’t like the way on table assaulting units have to climb over the fortification features to get to the garrison. It is an accurate simulation, but messy on table.
Adam, as defender, felt he needed a horse unit as a mobile reserve. This bumps the defender’s army breakpoint to 4 units, which he also thought was necessary.
Chris was pressured by the 8 game turn time limit. In turn 7 he was one turn away from getting his horse off table. There was no way he could get any infantry off table in 8 turns. So we decided to extend the game duration to 10 turns (8 for a small narrow table). But even this might be unfair given marching speed of infantry. I might go for 11 or 12 turns (9 or 10 turns on a small narrow table).
Chris asked, do cannon still get eliminated on contact when garrisoning a field fortification. The answer is yes, particularly as they can be supported by foot, but I’m now wondering whether this is reasonable.
Commenting on the scenario, not the game, Adam didn’t think breaking through a prepared position was realistic for a battle. He could imagine it as a small rear guard action, but couldn’t imagine it as a big set piece between two armies. Adam suggested viewing each unit as 100-200 men not 1-2,000. I’m sympathetic to Adam’s challenge on army-versus-army, but personally I can imagine a situation where this could happen: on occasion an army did attempt to fight through a smaller blockade to break a siege. I’ll leave it to you to decide for yourselves what the scenario represents.